Back to
 
  MSUE Resource Library
  Newspaper Article Index
  Forest Information Main Page
  MSAF Home Page


Wood Biomass Inventories
Article #171, May 2011
By Bill Cook

     How much wood grows in Michigan?

     It’s a good question when thinking about wood-based energy, especially proposals that intend to consume large quantities of wood, such as the proposal to build a large cellulosic ethanol plant in the eastern Upper Peninsula.  Is there enough wood? 

     A recent research study looked at the Michigan forest inventory within 150 miles of Kinross, Michigan.  The study area included all or part of 29 counties and from inventory data gathered from 2004 to 2008.  The report did not assess timber resources from Ontario or that which might be delivered beyond the 150 mile radius through less conventional transportation means. 

     Frontier Renewable Resources expects to need about a million green tons of hardwood pulpwood to produce 40 million gallons of ethanol per year in the plant proposed for Kinross.  The 150 mile radius for the inventory study was chosen as it reflects the distance that wood might be affordably transported.  The report broke the distances into 30 mile zones for both the Upper Peninsula and the Lower Peninsula.  Wood closer to the facility would presumably be more economical to procure. 

     The standing volume of wood (on land open to timber harvest) came to about 274 million green tons.  Hardwood species, those with broad leaves, account for 176 million tons.  The remainder consists of softwood species (conifers). 

     Standing timber volumes suggest that there would be enough hardwood to harvest for 176 years, if all the growing stock was cut and there was no growth or mortality.  More realistically and generally-speaking, harvested volumes should not exceed volumes grown across a large landscape and through time. 

     For decades, the statewide forest inventory has been growing about twice the volume of wood harvested.  Each year from 2004 through 2008, about 4.2 million green tons of hardwood volumes were grown within 150 miles of Kinross.  Of that, 2.4 million green tons were annually harvested, leaving about 1.8 million green tons added to the forest inventory each year. 

     The fact that volume and growth in the forest exists does not necessarily mean that the volume will be made available for harvest and subsequent use by a wood-using facility.  The difficult question to answer is how much of the1.8 million green tons of annual growth will forest owners allow to be harvested? 

     Forest ownership, willingness to sell, distance from a road, forest and site conditions, forest product markets, and parcel size are examples of characteristics that must be considered.  Often, these factors are at least partly dependent upon one or more additional factors.  And then, some of these characteristics continually change, making an analysis more difficult. 

     Both public and private lands have forest areas that are unlikely to be harvested for one reason or another.  Sites may be too wet, access too difficult, or the timber may simply not be mature enough or well-enough stocked.  On public lands, some portions are designated for uses that may not include timber harvest.  These designations do not include areas such as park and wilderness areas where harvest has already been disallowed by law or regulation.  On private land, owners may have no interest in either forest management or harvest.  Ownership has been changing and parcels are becoming more numerous and smaller.  This makes management and harvest more difficult. 

     During the five year study period, three major pulpwood-using mills closed in the Lower Peninsula.  Together they consumed about 1.2 million green tons.  The impact of these market closures were not fully incorporated into the five year inventory period from the report.  Statewide pulpwood production in 2007 was about 1.1 million cords per year less than in 1997.  Historical trends suggest much of this wood will be made available to the market if a new market emerges.

     Hardwood forest types occupy two-thirds of the study area.  Over half of that is privately owned and supplies nearly three-quarters of the current hardwood harvest.  Each 30 mile zone has different sets of inventory numbers, reflecting regional differences in forest, ownership, and recent history.    

     Throughout the study area, three-quarters of the forest lies within a half-mile of a road.  Access is fairly easy and cost efficient.  About half the forest area consists of fully or over stocked stands, meaning the forest contains about as many trees as possible.   Forest that is not fully stocked is less likely to be harvested in the immediate future but does represent a source of additional timber volumes over time. 

     The inventory study is titled; “Timber Resources and Factors Affecting Timber Availability and Sustainability for Kinross, Michigan,” by Larry Leefers and Michael Vasievich, January 2011.  It can be found on the Michigan Biofuels website at [www.michiganforestbiofuels.org].  It is part of the Feedstock Supply Chain Center of Energy Excellence. 

- 30 -

Trailer
Bill Cook is an MSU Extension forester providing educational programming for the Upper Peninsula. His office is located at the MSU Forest Biomass Innovation Center near Escanaba. The Center is the headquarters for three MSU Forestry properties in the U.P., with a combined area of about 8,000 acres. He can be reached at cookwi@msu.edu or 906-786-1575.


Prepared by Bill Cook, Forester/Biologist, Michigan State University Extension, 6005 J Road, Escanaba, MI  49829
906-786-1575 (voice),  906-786-9370 (fax),  e-mail:  cookwi@msu.edu

Use / reprinting of these articles is encouraged. Please notify Bill Cook.
By-line should read "Bill Cook, MSU Extension" Please use the article trailer whenever possible.

Michigan State University is an affirmative action equal opportunity institution.  The U.S. Department of Agriculture prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital status or family status.   (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.)



This website is maintained by Bill Cook, Michigan State University Extension Forest in the Upper Peninsula.  Comments, questions, and suggestions are gratefully accepted. 
Last update of this page was 18 May, 2011


 

 

This site is hosted by School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science at Michigan Technological University.

Michigan Tech